Skip to content
IGCSE·Tuition
Biology · Lessons

Distinguish repeatability from validity

The two words sound alike, and under exam pressure it is easy to use the wrong one.

On this page
  1. How are the two ideas different?
  2. How to check each one, step by step
  3. Worked example
  4. The mistake to watch for
  5. Check yourself
  6. Where this leads next

Repeatability means that repeating the same method gives similar results. Validity means that the method really tests the question and that the conclusion is justified. A result can have one without the other.

This lesson builds on choosing a control, because controlling variables is what makes an investigation valid.

How are the two ideas different?

Repeatability is a question about the data: do the repeated readings agree? You answer it by looking at the spread of repeats or the range.

Validity is a question about the design: was only the intended factor changed, and was the right thing measured? You answer it by checking control variables and the measurement itself.

How to check each one, step by step

  1. For repeatability: list the repeat readings for one condition and find the range. A small range means good repeatability.
  2. Calculate the mean of the repeats if they agree, and note any anomaly.
  3. For validity: write the independent variable, then read the method for anything else that changed between set-ups.
  4. Check the measurement: does it really measure what the question claims, such as oxygen produced, not just a bubble count of uneven size?
  5. Write both verdicts separately with one reason each.

Worked example

All data are invented for practice. A student investigates the effect of temperature on yeast by counting bubbles of carbon dioxide per minute. At 30 °C she repeats the count three times.

RepeatBubbles per minute
131
233
332

Step 1, repeatability: the readings range from 31 to 33, a range of 2 bubbles per minute.

Step 2, mean: (31 + 33 + 32) ÷ 3 = 96 ÷ 3 = 32 bubbles per minute. The readings agree closely, so the results are repeatable.

Step 3, validity check: reading the method, the tube at 30 °C contained 5 g of yeast but the tube at 50 °C contained 8 g. The mass of yeast changed along with the temperature.

Step 4, verdict: the results are repeatable but not valid for the question about temperature, because the mass of yeast was not controlled. A higher count could come from more yeast rather than higher temperature.

Step 5, the fix: use the same mass of yeast in every tube, then measure again.

Contrast a second student whose three repeats were 20, 35 and 26 bubbles per minute. The range is 15 and the mean is (20 + 35 + 26) ÷ 3 = 81 ÷ 3 = 27. The results are poorly repeatable, and the first step is to find out why the counts vary.

The mistake to watch for

The usual mix-up is to call a fair test repeatable, or to call consistent results valid.

Mistaken answer: “The results are valid because the three readings were almost the same.”

Agreeing readings show repeatability. Validity depends on whether the variables were controlled.

The correction is to use each word for its own job: repeats agree means repeatable, other variables controlled means valid. If you are asked for one, do not substitute the other.

Check yourself

All data are invented.

1. Four plants in a light experiment gave leaf counts of 6, 6, 7 and 6 under the same lamp. What can you say about repeatability?

Show answer

The readings have a small range of 1 leaf, so the results are repeatable. Repeatability does not say anything about whether other variables were controlled.

2. A student compares growth in sunlight and in shade, but the shade plants were given more water. Are the results valid? Explain.

Show answer

Not valid. Water was not kept the same, so growth differences could be due to water as well as light. Use the same volume of water for every plant.

3. An investigation has a range of 15 between repeats. Suggest one reason it is poorly repeatable and one check.

Show answer

The method may be hard to carry out consistently, for example counting bubbles of uneven size by eye. Check by repeating with a more precise measurement, such as collecting gas in a syringe, and see whether the range falls.

Where this leads next

The last lesson in this module is turning a vague improvement into a specific measurement change. The mixed practice then tests all five skills together.

If you can explain the two words aloud but still swap them on paper, online one-to-one Biology tuition can train the exact wording with your own answers. The module overview lists every lesson.

Questions people ask

Can results be repeatable but not valid?

Yes. Repeat readings can agree closely and still be wrong as a test of the question, for example if another variable changed along with the one you wanted. The results are consistent but they do not show what the experiment claims to show.

What does valid mean in a Biology experiment?

A valid investigation measures the effect of the factor being tested and nothing else. It controls other variables and measures the right thing. If a variable was not controlled, you cannot be sure which factor caused the result.

Is repeatability the same as reproducibility?

Not quite. Repeatability is getting similar results when the same person repeats the method. Reproducibility is getting similar results when different people or different equipment are used. Check how your teacher or syllabus uses the terms, and define the word in your own answer.

Updated:

Your next step

If these two ideas still blur together, a one-to-one teacher can give you new experiments and ask you to justify each word until the difference is automatic.

Paid one-hour trial at your assigned teacher’s confirmed rate, starting from RM80. Other fees, schedules and ongoing arrangements are confirmed directly with your teacher after the trial class.

Tuition is arranged with a parent or guardian. Send them this page on WhatsApp and they can enquire for you.

Parent or guardian? Enquire here

9,000+ students helped through our service