Skip to content
IGCSE·Tuition
Global Perspectives · Practice

Integrated practice for independent report planning

Planning skills only stick when you try them on a fresh case.

This set practises four skills from independent report planning: outlines, source ledgers, section checks and self-review. Every example is invented.

Try each question on paper first, then open the answer. Questions get harder as you go.

Questions

1. (Outline) The question is “How far has a fictional town, Bandar Teratai, reduced plastic bags?” A learner’s headings are Introduction, Background, Body, Conclusion. What is wrong, and what is a better first step?

Show answer

The headings could fit any topic and do not serve the question. A better first step is to list findings as short notes, group them by the part of the question they answer, and name each group by its job. See outlines.

2. (Outline) Group these fictional notes by job: N1 shop survey shows bag use fell; N2 market traders say customers still ask for bags; N3 a council report defines “reduced” as fewer bags per sale.

Show answer

N3 defines. N1 supports the claim of reduction. N2 challenges it. Order: define, support, challenge, judge.

3. (Ledger) A ledger row reads “Report says things are improving.” List what is missing.

Show answer

The source details and date accessed, the location in the source, whether it is a quotation or a paraphrase, and a specific claim or figure in place of “improving”. A viewpoint note is also missing.

4. (Ledger) A learner copies a sentence word for word from a fictional report but records it as a paraphrase. Why is this a problem?

Show answer

Copied wording must be in quotation marks and marked as a quotation. Recording it as a paraphrase presents the source’s words as the learner’s own, which breaks honest credit.

5. (Ledger) Sort into fact, viewpoint or interpretation, using fictional sources: (a) “The council counted 190 trips a day.” (b) “The council says the trial is a success.” (c) “So the evidence is probably weaker than it looks.”

Show answer

(a) Fact reported by a source. (b) Viewpoint of the council. (c) The learner’s interpretation, to be labelled as such.

6. (Section check) A plan has a section on the history of plastic. The question is about bag use in one town. Apply the test “Without this, the reader could not judge ___.”

Show answer

The reader could still judge bag use in the town without a history of plastic. Reduce it to a line of context or move it to a notes file. See section checks.

7. (Section check) A learner says “It took me three days, so it stays.” Respond.

Show answer

Effort measures the learner’s time, not the reader’s need. Judge the section by what it lets the reader decide about the question. Keep what contributes, and park the rest.

8. (Self-review) A checklist item says “Is my plan good?” Rewrite it so it can be tested.

Show answer

For example: “Does every section have a stated job that serves the question?” or “Does every claim link to a ledger entry?” Each can be answered by checking the plan.

9. (Self-review) A learner sends a plan to a friend with “Fix this and send back a finished version.” What would be a better use of outside help?

Show answer

Run the checklist first. Then ask about one specific item the learner cannot resolve, and write the answer in their own words. Check with the teacher or exam centre about what help is allowed. See self-review.

10. (Integrated) Fictional case: the question is “To what extent do bicycle lanes help a small town?” The plan has four sections, but the judgement section relies on a claim about shop sales that no section builds, and the ledger has one source, a council news release. List three actions.

Show answer
  1. Add a section that builds the shop-sales point from a real source, or remove the claim from the judgement.
  2. Look for at least one source with a different viewpoint, such as a business group, and record it in the ledger with a viewpoint note.
  3. Add a limits note, since a single council source speaks for its own trial.

If you got these wrong

Error typeQuestionsGo to
Headings that fit any topic, notes not grouped by job1, 2Create an outline
Missing details, copied wording, mixing fact and viewpoint3, 4, 5Build a source ledger
Keeping sections because of effort, vague jobs6, 7Check section contributions
Untestable checklist items, handing work over8, 9Self-review checklist
Unsupported claims in a judgement10All four lessons, starting with the ledger

Teachers on our team can work through your own planning questions in online one-to-one Global Perspectives tuition.

Questions people ask

Are the sources in this practice set real?

No. Every town, school, source and figure is invented for practice and labelled fictional. In your own research you must use real sources and record where each one came from.

Should I answer in full sentences?

Short answers are enough. Aim to name the skill you used and give the reason. The aim is to practise the thinking, not to write a report.

Sources

  1. Cambridge IGCSE Global Perspectives 0457 syllabus page

Updated:

Your next step

If the same kind of question keeps catching you out, a one-to-one teacher can rework it with you using your own topic.

Paid one-hour trial at your assigned teacher’s confirmed rate, starting from RM80. Other fees, schedules and ongoing arrangements are confirmed directly with your teacher after the trial class.

Tuition is arranged with a parent or guardian. Send them this page on WhatsApp and they can enquire for you.

Parent or guardian? Enquire here

9,000+ students helped through our service